Let’s get a high-level overview of these four books, what makes them different, and how they’re similar.
All 4 gospels focus on the story of Jesus
The Gospels are where we find all the famous Bible stories about Jesus. Because each Gospel is about the same main character, they all share several elements.
For example, each of the four gospels follows this general progression:
- A statement of Jesus’ divine status
(Mt 1:23; 3:13–17; Mk 1:1, 9–11; Lk 1:32–35; 3:21–22; Jn 1:1, 29–34) - Jesus’ miracles and teachings
(Mt 4–25; Mk 1–13; Lk 4–19:27; Jn 2–17) - Jesus’ betrayal, trial, and death
(Mt 26–27; Mk 14–15; Lk 19:28–23:56; Jn 18–19) - Jesus’ resurrection and encouragement to his followers
(Mt 28:1–15; Mk 16:1–8; Lk 24:1–12; Jn 20:1–10
Why do we need four gospels?
Many people (including myself!) have asked, “Do we really need four gospels in the Bible? That seems redundant. Shouldn’t one do the trick?”
Maybe that would be the case if Jesus were a regular person who just did regular things. But he isn’t, and he didn’t.
John says that the world itself couldn’t hold all the books that could be written about Jesus’ ministry (Jn 21:25). He’s probably being hyperbolic, but if there’s that much to say about Jesus, then we shouldn’t be surprised that we have multiple accounts of him in our Bible. If the world couldn’t hold his whole story, then surely a 16-chapter pamphlet like Mark couldn’t!
We have four gospels because during the early church period, four people found it necessary to tell the story of Jesus from four different perspectives. Each gospel was written for a different (original) group of people, by a different author, who was trying to accomplish a different purpose.
Let’s take a closer look at each one:
The Gospel of Matthew
Traditionally penned by the apostle of the same name, Matthew is the first gospel of the four. This gospel was written for people familiar with the Old Testament, both the Law of Moses and the prophets. Matthew makes more references to the Old Testament than any other gospel.
Matthew takes great care to show how Jesus fulfills the prophecies made about him earlier in the Bible—especially focusing on Jesus’ role as the Messiah. (The promised king descended from David.)
Today, Matthew is the perfect book to bridge the gap between the Old Testament and the New. In the famous Sermon on the Mount, Jesus says, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them” (Mt 5:17).
You can read an overview of Matthew here.
The Gospel of Mark
The Gospel of MarkThis is the shortest gospel. In fact, it’s possible that this gospel was written so that it could be easily memorized and told aloud—written to “go viral,” if you will.
According to early church tradition, this gospel was written by John Mark, the same guy who backed out of his missionary journey with Paul and Barnabas (Ac 15:37–39). Mark purportedly aided the apostle Peter later in life, and this gospel is an arranged collection of Peter’s memories of Jesus.
Mark was written for a wide audience. This gospel focuses on Jesus’ role as the suffering servant and son of God. While the other gospels contain long discourses and sermons of Jesus, Mark is all about action. This is where we see Jesus doing things, and then doing more things. It’s very action-oriented (the word “immediately” shows up frequently), and of the four gospels, Mark reads most like a story.
You can read an overview of Mark’s gospel here.
The Gospel of Luke
This is the longest of the four gospels—in fact, it’s the longest book of the New Testament for that matter. Luke is the historical, journalistic Gospel: a thorough account of the episodes in Jesus’ life arranged in chronological order. This gospel was written to establish believers in the teachings of Jesus (Lk 1:1–4).
Church tradition recognizes the first-century physician Luke as the author and editor of this book, which is how it gets its name. Luke may be one of the only non-Hebrew authors of the Bible based on a few clues we pick up in the New Testament. This gospel presents Jesus as the seeking savior of all nations (Lk 2:30–32). It was and continues to be a rich story of Jesus’ life and ministry for both those who don’t know much about Jesus and those who have a great deal of familiarity with the Old Testament.
You can read an overview of Luke’s gospel here.
The Gospel of John
The Gospel of JohnJohn is the persuasive Gospel. It’s written to show the miracles of Jesus, so that those who read his story will believe in him and have everlasting life (Jn 20:30–31).
John’s account of Jesus’ teachings and miracles emphasize the divine nature of Jesus Christ. To John, Jesus is the cosmic Son of God, come to destroy the works of the devil. The whole book is arranged to present Jesus this way.
That means the gospel of John has a very different feel from the other three. The way the gospel starts is a good example. Mark begins with Jesus’ baptism. Luke begins with the happenings surrounding Jesus’ birth. Matthew begins with Abraham, and traces the generations down to Jesus. But John takes us all the way back to the very first words of the Bible: “In the beginning” (Jn 1:1). John is telling the story of the divine being who became flesh, dwelt among us, and died so that we might have everlasting life.
You can read an overview of John’s gospel here.
I wrote The Beginner’s Guide to the Bible to give people a non-preachy, jargon-free overview of what the Bible is, what it’s for, and what it’s all about. You’ll walk away from it with enough knowledge to have a thoughtful conversation about the Bible with a pastor, an atheist, or anyone else.
How to read the gospels
The gospels, like the other books of the Bible, were intended to be read in one sitting. That doesn’t mean every time you read from John you need to read the whole thing. But it does mean that if you want to know one of them better, you should set aside an hour or so to read the whole gospel in one go.
This gives you a feel for the general “flow” of the gospel’s narrative. You’ll notice different recurring motifs. You’ll see how the tone shifts in different movements.
As you read the gospels, ask these questions:
- What does Jesus say about himself?
- Whom is Jesus talking to? (This is vital. Is he talking to his disciples, his enemies, a massive crowd?)
- What does Jesus say about God?
- How does Jesus react to different situations? What pleases him? What upsets him?
- What does Jesus tell people to do?
Why are there so many different gospel accounts? I’ll write a whole post on why this is the case soon, but in the meantime you may want to check out Dr. Mark Strauss’s video course on how these four different perspectives describe Jesus. (Heads-up: if you buy it, Zondervan gives me a small kickback.)
Having just read all four of your gospel overviews with diagrams, I must say they are wonderfully clear and simple— what an invaluable teaching & ministry resource! I also admire the way you stressed that people should read each gospel right through at one sitting if possible, to understand the whole story, instead of just dipping into the Bible here & there, like some kind of recipe book.
While many Christians are happy to read an entire romantic novel or thriller in a couple of days, they are encouraged to jump back & forth between single verses in the Old & New Testaments, analysing a few verses each day, completely out of their original context, and therefore lose the intended meaning.
The New Testament is the very foundation of our faith, and yet how many Christians have ever taken time to read it patiently through from beginning to end? Well done to you for trying to “make their paths straight”.
Hi Jeffery,
I would like to purchase a DVD of your teaching on Leviticus and maybe get a printout of your board. How can I go about getting a DVd and a printout and what is the price?
Thanks for the vote of confidence, Betty! I don’t have a DVD option right now, but I am hoping to provide some video services later this year. Stay tuned … ;-)
Could I format what’s on that whiteboard into a infographic? Is there special permission I need to do so?
Thanks!
You’re free to use it in a noncommercial way, Cassidy! All I ask is that you link back to this page to let folks know where you got the content and structure.
Hope it’s helpful!
Great, thank you!
I love these videos! Well worth 10 minutes of our time to view.
Well thanks! I love you, so we’re even. =D
An interesting and explicit explanation. Thank you.
I like your bible charts, pointwise study, it’s interesting. I use such method in my teaching to my class. Thank you Sir. You are working hard to dig deep in scripture. It will be helpful to me.
How can I review past white board videos by Jeffery K. ? There was one posted earlier “The New Testament” … I would like to review and save it, but not sure how to search for it on website? Thanks. WH
Hi, Wayne! You might want to subscribe to my Youtube channel. That should do the trick!
So very meaningful! Concise and comprehensible. Thank you, a great addition to my Bible studies.
Wayne H.
It’s good overall however the conclusion that Luke may not have been a Hebrew may be erroneous. He may have been a Hellenized Jew. There is no definitive proof either way. I recommend Zola Levitt’s article on this subject. https://www.levitt.com/essays/luke.
Could be. There’s a great deal of Christian and Jewish tradition that could be incorrect (including the idea that Luke wrote the gospel of Luke). But there’s enough agreement on this point for me to be comfortable with it. =)
Jeffrey:
You wrote “But there’s enough agreement on this point for me to be comfortable with it.”
That is very vague and ambiguous and if you presented it as being credible to any authoritative religious institution without sources needless to say it would be deemed unacceptable.
Could you please share some scholarly sources for which you base your conclusion on?
It’s very important that we back up anything we say when asked and not be under the impression just because one of us says something it must be true.
Hi William. I’m not presenting anything on this site to any “authoritative religious institution.” And having read the article you shared, it seems you’re already familiar with the Colossians 4 argument for Luke’s non-Jewishness. Dr. McCall pooh-poohs it, claiming that “Paul is speaking of his fellow workers in the preaching ministry. However, Luke was not ever described as being actively involved in the work of preaching, but was rather Paul’s personal physician and historian.”
Two problems with this:
1. In Paul’s letter to Philemon, he includes Luke in the same list of “fellow workers” as Mark and Aristarchus (compare Col 4:10–14 to Phlm 23–24).
2. Where does the Bible describe Luke was Paul’s “personal historian and physician”?
There’s more biblical argument for Luke being a Gentile than for Luke even writing the gospel and following historical account attributed to him.
And for anyone reading along: I don’t claim to be any more credible than any other guy with a whiteboard. ;-)
Love your fresh and interesting work Jeffery… thanks so much for making it available. I am always looking for fresh and innovative ways to learn myself and to teach others.
Thanks for the kind words, Mike!
Thank you for this…I love it. I am trying to place an emphasis on just the 4 gospels for my ‘tween group of students and this is working well. So many other curriculum get too bogged down in the Old Testament. Although there are places where the Old Testament plays a role, I want the kids to know what Jesus said.
We cannot underestimate the necessity of the OT to truly understand what and who God is. I would even say that one cannot really know God or Jesus without having a healthy understanding of both Jesus and the “Law and the Prophets.” The two are one. .
Babs, you are absolutely right.
Christianity begins with Christ & the New Testament,
Christ & the New Covenant,
and God’s New Message to Humanity,
brought by His Beloved Son,
and carried to the farthest ends of the earth by His disciples, following Christ’s command.
It replaces the Old.
@Babs, my comment agreeing with yours seems to have been blocked, while someone else’s comment opposing yours was not. I am shocked at this appalling violation of Freedom of Speech and Thought, especially by one “Christian” blocking another Christian from agreeing with a third Christian about the importance of the Christian New Testament, the very foundation of our faith! How odd.
Very interesting summary, thank you.